Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanson Brothers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:46, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hanson Brothers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Never watched Slap Shot but I don't find these characters to have enough coverage and notability to warrant their own article here. It's current state right now doesn't give much hope either. GamerPro64 02:20, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 07:25, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 07:25, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 07:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I am pretty surprised by this nomination. These characters are probably the most popular characters from any sports movie ever. They are talked about in media alot. -DJSasso (talk) 11:54, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Djsasso. The article does need to be improved but this is far away from not being notable. Hell you can even find websites that sell Hanson Brothers costumes. Deadman137 (talk) 21:31, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand Funny, just watched this movie last week in 1080p. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk • contribs)
Keep - In the world of sports, the Hanson brothers are well known. GoodDay (talk) 14:54, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It's obvious you've never watched Slap Shot. These characters are very notable and have received significant coverage from many sources. Smartyllama (talk) 17:50, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.