Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Growing Man

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Marvel Comics characters: G. Tone 11:06, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Growing Man[edit]

Growing Man (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional character TTN (talk) 00:39, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 00:39, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 00:39, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: AfD heading for a NC (two D, two M, and two K); however, the willingness of Keeps ro merge, means a merge could also be considered; try a relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Britishfinance (talk) 09:19, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate. I would tend to think that someone who types "Growing man" into the search bar in Wikipedia is looking for Development of the human body, Developmental psychology or Maturity (psychological). They're also quite likely to be a child, who might be confused to find an article about a comic book character. The current content, if kept, should be moved to Growing Man (comics) (and if merged it should still be moved there in order to retain attribution). I don't really care whether the article about the comic book character is kept, merged or deleted.—S Marshall T/C 10:32, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The "character" is extremely minor, and there seem to be no reliable, secondary sources discussing it. At the very least, I was unable to find any, and none of the "Keep" or "Merge" votes above provided any. Thus, merging non-notable, only primary sourced information to other articles does not solve anything, it just conflates the target article/list with even more non-notable cruft. There are also the concerns that S Marshall brought up regarding the article's name space, so regardless of the results of this AFD, that is definitely an issue that should be addressed. Rorshacma (talk) 16:46, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.