Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gorson (Dungeons & Dragons)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Geryon (Dungeons & Dragons). (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 21:10, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gorson (Dungeons & Dragons)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a minor character that currently fails to establish independent notability. TTN (talk) 19:27, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 19:27, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to Devil (Dungeons & Dragons). BOZ (talk) 19:43, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would merge this to Geryon (Dungeons & Dragons), actually. Chiefly Geryon's minion. bd2412 T 20:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Geryon (Dungeons & Dragons). I was going to say Devil (Dungeons & Dragons) too initially, but after more research, Geryon is the better target. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 20:27, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Geryon (Dungeons & Dragons)#Vassals. I agree that this seems to be the best target. I'm not sure exactly what we'd merge; some of it is sourced, but to merge content from primary sources would probably be undue weight in Geryon's article. I don't see anything useful on Google Books. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:30, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and speedy close. As usual, the just-returned nominator with a long track record of disruption is presenting an unresearched nomination with a generic rationale rather than making a reasonable effort to address legitimate content issues. This is really a debate over how the subject should be covered (independent article, list, discussed in a broader subject), not a genuine deletion discussion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 21:58, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Geryon, per the above. Interesting that target isn't even wikilinked in the present version of the article... Jclemens (talk) 07:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge instead as this is still questionably solid for its own article. SwisterTwister talk 21:53, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, no coverage by reliable sources. Per WP:NOTINHERITED, Gorson needs to demonstrate notability independent of the D&D franchise. Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 02:11, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.