Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gertrude Stubbs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 22:11, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gertrude Stubbs[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable local April Fools Day hoax. RS coverage is insignificant, most other sources simply repeat the hoax. –dlthewave ☎ 20:26, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 21:01, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:27, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete wikipedia is not for trivia Jtbobwaysf (talk) 08:54, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing demonstrates the sustained coverage needed for notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:52, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough RS here to establish WP:not. Deathlibrarian (talk) 12:17, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of coverage. Aoba47 (talk) 19:36, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 07:16, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete only one source given. fails GNG. Dial911 (talk) 16:21, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 20:14, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.