Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Miller (Lassie)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lassie (1954 TV series). Milburn's suggestion can be discussed in greater detail later, the page history is still there. King of ♠ 04:19, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

George Miller (Lassie)[edit]

George Miller (Lassie) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Do we really need an article for every Lassie character that isn't Lassie? Also, created by LTA sockmaster. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 03:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete the sources do not show why Miller would at all be an important character.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Lassie. A fairly minor fictional character. The article is nothing but plot, and the character doesn't have any reliable sources that I can find discussing him in any meaningful way. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 20:28, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E 02:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 14:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 14:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Perhaps the various characters could be merged into a list article? They do seem to have some not-completely terrible sources. Or would outright deletion be preferable? Josh Milburn (talk) 22:36, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.