Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gatekeeper parent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:03, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gatekeeper parent[edit]

nn dicdef. One (talk) 14:33, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Move Wikipedia is not a Dictionary. Maybe a move to Wiktionary might be a good idea. A bloke called Andrew^Convos_{My Messies} 18:20, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The article already contains more information than a dictionary definition, and the concept of Maternal gatekeeping, which the article should probably be renamed to, is notable as demonstrated by significant coverage in multiply reliable sources. Gnews, Gbooks, Gscholar -- plenty of material there for an in-depth article. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 18:21, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Agree with LinguistAtLarge's points. The topic is not self-limiting and could be expanded even further than it already is.--SharkxFanSJ (talk) 20:59, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The language however was not NPOV--I adjusted the lede paragraph--the rest needs looking to. The rename suggested above seems reasonable also. DGG (talk) 21:46, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.