Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Hogan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Hogan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Meets WP:NFOOTBALL due to a single appearance in an allegedly 'fully professional league' six years ago. The rest of his football career has been at a much lower level and there is no evidence of any WP:GNG-level coverage. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one appearance is insufficient when GNG is failed comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 10:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per GS, the presumption of notability in NFOOTBALL isn't valid when an article comprehensively fails GNG. I can only find trivial mentions in online Norwegian- and English-language sources, plus a few interviews with the subject (which likely don't count towards significant coverage). Jogurney (talk) 17:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a complete failure of GNG. It is time we stopped being footballpedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
He played in Eliteserien, a highly competitive tournament, therefore this article should not be deleted.User:morhveem (talk) 01:15, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree that brief Q&As don't count towards WP:GNG. Since Hogan only just about passes WP:NFOOTBALL, I would say the GNG fail takes priority. Given his age, he has no credible chance of building on his one appearance at professional level. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:47, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.