Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frontiers for Young Minds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. As even the nominator changed to 'keep', and there were no arguments against keeping the article, the consensus is easy to see... PhantomSteve/talk¦contribs\ 18:03, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Frontiers for Young Minds[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant independant coverage found. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coverage cited in original (very basic) wikipedia article including Scientific American and the American Library Association's award page for the journal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CreaturelyMe (talk • contribs) 21:45, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect back to Frontiers Media#List of journals like it was a few days ago. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:12, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 07:33, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Pretty well known science outreach program and an interesting attempt to give credit for it. Possibly unique journal.

1.https://neuroscience.berkeley.edu/kids-are-the-reviewers-at-this-scientific-journal/ 2.https://www.cell.com/neuron/pdf/S0896-6273(16)30941-2.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi5i7fG3ujqAhWpoHIEHapMDOs4FBAWMAJ6BAgIEAE&usg=AOvVaw3Cpl-JUYXqKc5392DLJhDH (Not independent (written by editor of journal) but cited 20 times (suggest. independent coverage) and in Neuron from Cell press not sponsored (Neuron is a respected H high impact journal. ) 3. academic paper https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121596/ 4.https://www.lycoming.edu/news/stories/2019/04/frontiers-for-young-minds.aspx 5. https://www.dailyprincetonian.com/article/2019/11/psychology-professor-sabine-kastner-receives-award-for-education-in-neuroscience won award from Sfn for education. 6. Scientific American story 7.https://www.discovermagazine.com/mind/how-to-better-teach-kids-science-just-ask-them 8. Another scientific paper https://europepmc.org/article/pmc/pmc5459263

Popular News about journal stories indicating concept.

1. http://m.digitaljournal.com/science/rudolph-s-luminescent-nose-essential-to-guiding-santa-s-sleigh/article/452955 2. There are others but tricky on my phone.

The awards from American library association, the Society for Neuroscience, the papers in academy journals describing the concept and popular News stories suggest the concept of a journal being reviewed by children is both notable and innovative and should not be redirected or deleted. It would not be fair to apply usual rules per common sense re indexing etc. PainProf (talk) 16:00, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Even though I'm the nominator for this, based on what PainProf said, I've changed my mind to keep. -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:52, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Changing to Keep after the expansion from CreatureMe. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:27, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.