Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Rauscher
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Let'srun (talk) 03:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Frederick Rauscher[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Frederick Rauscher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NPROF or WP:NAUTHOR. Longhornsg (talk) 03:04, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Philosophy, and Michigan. Longhornsg (talk) 03:04, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Reasonable citations in GS for philosophy. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC).
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Illinois and Pennsylvania. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:NAUTHOR. His book Naturalism and Realism in Kant's Ethics is the subject of multiple in-depth reviews in reliable sources.[1][2][3] I already noted this three years ago when declining a PROD so it really should have been checked before nominating. – Joe (talk) 14:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Joe is right that he meets WP:NAUTHOR. Qflib (talk) 18:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.