Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/For lack of a better comic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm treating "Move to creator's userspace" as "delete" because we don't know whether the creator wants that. Sandstein 07:52, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For lack of a better comic[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable web comic lacking non-trivial in-depth support. reddogsix (talk) 04:45, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 06:19, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The Paste Magazine reference gives the comic some weight. A quick Google Search returns a few articles from other websites talking about the comic. The article's existed for one day before being nominated - I think the subject could be notable enough for an article, and I suggest giving User:Williemuse (or someone else) more time to improve it. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:35, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Neutral~~ - This is pretty weak, as two of the three sources [1] [2] available on the topic only dedicate one sentence to it. The third [3] has slightly more content, but hardly enough to really do much with it. I don't think Pleated Jeans, a source that is currently in use, is reliable, or if the content has any value whatsoever. Regardless, the article needs some real improvement. ~Mable (chat) 09:54, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - eh, this is a lost cause, there's really too little to work with. You need at least some dedicated coverage for a creative work. ~Mable (chat) 12:06, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm torn on this one. I've heard of this comic and its stuff is frequently reposted in places like GalleyCat and Dorkly, but there's not a lot out there as a whole that I've been able to find so far. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 18:26, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete at best for now as searches simply found nothing else convincingly better and the article is still questionable at best. SwisterTwister talk 22:24, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move to creator's userspace. Programming G E E K (mah page! // use words to communicate page) —Preceding undated comment added 12:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.