Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluid movement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:51, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fluid movement[edit]

I can't find any evidence that this subject is real. Booyabazooka 09:29, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP is not for things made up in school one day. (aeropagitica) 09:40, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Original research and nonsense. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 10:12, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Although fluid movement is possible, like pouring water from one cup to another, it's a de facto thing! No need for an article. ^KILO-_LIMA 23:30, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - At a stretch, fluid movement could be used as a layman's term for some biological events but there are more accurate and appropriate terms for them like tissue oedema, osmosis or (tongue-in-cheek) micturition (or urinating for anybody who doesn't know). Green Giant 01:52, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--み使い Mitsukai 13:59, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.