Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edelweiss Broking Limited

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Created by banned user, CU confirmed Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edelweiss Broking Limited[edit]

Edelweiss Broking Limited (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was redirected to parent company, as this subsidiary does not have enough independent notability for a standalone article. In addition, the article is currently nothing more than an advertisement. The article was created by a user with the name of the subsidiary, who was promptly blocked for violating the username policy. The redirect was then reverted by a new account which was created less than two hours after the first account was blocked. Onel5969 TT me 12:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:onel5969, I completely agree with you that this article was created with a username which is not allowed. It was my very first experience as a wiki writer.I felt a need to write about this entity.It has an office near my residence. I knew about it for a significant time but never knew how big this firm is. I recently came to know that it is a fast growing brand in India but I could not find it on wikipedia. So, I felt that this should be my very first article. But being a beginner I made a mistake of naming my username as the name of the company itself. It took a lot of time to gather all the information and write this article. After you told it is an advertisement, I looked at various financial services companies of India like Zerodha, Motilal Oswal Group, Angel Broking . Then, I realized that this article just have company information and history, not even any product detailing or awards etc. compared to other articles. I am a keen learner and will love to know what can I edit here.
Thanking you in anticipation. Piyushpanc (talk) 13:30, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Responded to you on my talk page. Onel5969 TT me 15:36, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • SNOW Delete and Redirect as this is clear advertising only sourced by their own published and republished business announcements and there's no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone else and there never has been here, the information and sources are all suggestive of PR, so that alone is enough to delete. There's never a defense when it's even clear paid press is being as sources, which says enough. To add, I even looked at the history and the article author is the company account in which then this other account is now contributing hence all confirming an advertised campaign. Even if there was double or triple the amount of "news", that wouldn't excuse the clear advertisement of them. SwisterTwister talk 17:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

kindly suggest if you still feel I am wrong. I would love to learn from you and follow in my future editings. Thanking you in anticipation. Piyushpanc (talk) 11:55, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your time and patience

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Week Keep or Redirect Merge with Parent company is the only option here. This company is definitely notable. Light2021 (talk) 05:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks a lot Light2021 for noticing it. I tried to write as neutral as possible. Kindly suggest why should we not keep it as it is instead of redirecting? I will love to learn and improve.

Thanks Piyushpanc (talk) 19:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree on the notability part Piyushpanc . There has to be significant content for encyclopedic standards for each to write independent article for each. in this case One would suffice. Light2021 (talk) 06:07, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Edelweiss_Broking_Limited&oldid=1089532185"