Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doruk Erkan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doruk Erkan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP with no external references Rathfelder (talk) 21:07, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Doesn't pass WP:PROFESSOR, and a few trivial mentions doesn't pass WP:GNG. He has a few decent citation counts, but none are for anything solely written by him. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:45, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete article is outdated, he's been made an associate professor [1]. That's still a very good sign that he's not notable, especially in medicine. I don't see anything here that would get him in past PROF, and the GNG isn't met, and even if it was it should be considered subordinate to PROF in the overwhelming majority of cases involving academics. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:29, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.