Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devon Higgs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Morgan Jackson-King. MBisanz talk 01:23, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Devon Higgs[edit]
- Devon Higgs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
An actor, but obviously not yet notable under our internal site standards. Delete. rootology (C)(T) 16:34, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Based on a quick Gsearch and GNews search, he doesn't appear to meet WP:N. LinguistAtLarge 20:16, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:48, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:49, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Morgan Jackson-King. Punkmorten (talk) 09:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable. Decltype (talk) 14:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Schuym1 (talk) 02:27, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Merge to Morgan Jackson-King and set redirect. Minor notability for this little guy has NOW been found and added to the article. However, since he is only 4 years old, it is minor and all in association with his character. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect and merge appropriate amount to Morgan Jackson-King. Anyone who has seen my edits knows I'm all for articles on notable kids, but this needs to go (along with some refs) because it gives no information that can't be covered by mentioning it in the article of his character. SMSO is a Wikipedia mirror and the article on Wellard doesn't mention Devon or his character. Since there's no biographical info for the kid, an article on him is not yet viable. -0 Mgm|(talk) 23:13, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to character article as all the content of the article can be accommodated in the target without undue weight. Skomorokh 20:38, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Vote changed to merge: to character article. Schuym1 (talk) 21:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.