Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deuce and Charger

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 12:23, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deuce and Charger[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Deuce and Charger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 11:56, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 11:56, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 11:56, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as nomination appears to have been made by a bot and not an actual person. A look at the nominator's edit history shows no useful or constructive edits, only repetitive, dishonest boilerplate nominations of articles concerning notable fictional characters. Thus, it appears to be some kind of bot just indiscriminately nominating articles in fictional character categories. Any interactions beyond the nomination are of such an incoherent nature that CleverBot conversations make more sense. --131.123.51.67 (talk) 15:20, 20 November 2019 (UTC) — 131.123.51.67 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Sock of permabanned troll A Nobody Reyk YO! 17:16, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Find sources or Merge - I created this article back when I was still new to Wikipedia, and ignorant of how notability worked. There are zero citations in the article, so unless anyone really thinks these two characters are notable, and is willing to find and add reliable, secondary sources demonstrating this, the article should be deleted, or merged into some relevant DC character list article. Nightscream (talk) 15:50, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - failure of WP:GNG, nothing worth preserving. I considered a selective merge to or redirect to Fearsome Five, but I'm not certain that is notable either. --Killer Moff- ill advisedly sticking his nose in since 2011 (talk) 16:01, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: it should be kept just for the heck of it, but even though it fails WP:GNG, it may or may not pass WP:NOTABILITY. Cheers! CentralTime301 20:34, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • A. That's completely nonsensical. B. You do realize "WP:GNG" and "WP:NOTABILITY" are the same thing right? TTN (talk) 20:39, 20 November 2019 (UTC)1[reply]
  • Delete. My initial instinct was to merge, but based on what Killer Moff said, I don't know there's really a good place to merge it. Unless somebody comes up with one, I'll say to delete this pairing that doesn't have (evidence of) coverage in out-of-universe sources. —C.Fred (talk) 01:17, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Pure fancruft defended by socks and banned editors. Who wants to join them, eh? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:05, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Unreferenced cruft.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:14, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete- unsourced fancruft. Reyk YO! 17:16, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Deuce_and_Charger&oldid=928194332"