Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darryl Morris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Charmed characters. (non-admin closure) f e minist 13:12, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Darryl Morris[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Even though this character was a primary/featured character on a major show, I could not locate enough information to support that he has received significant coverage in third-party, reliable sources. Fails WP:FICT, WP:NOTE, and WP:RS. Limited evidence of independent notability and all references to this appear to be limited to plot summary. Aoba47 (talk) 14:10, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Aoba47 (talk) 14:10, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Aoba47 (talk) 14:10, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep or Merge to List of Charmed characters where he already has an entry. There's plenty of RS mentions, but I'm not seeing a whole lot of commentary, so I'm ambivalent. Absolutely does not need to be deleted, per WP:ATD. Jclemens (talk) 06:03, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the comment. Aoba47 (talk) 14:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:37, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or merge. No section on reception/impact, no apparent real world significance, pure plot summary. Merge per above is fine too. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:19, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:53, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.