Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cornell Dubilier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cornell Dubilier[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references, no reliable sources come up on Google. CapitalSasha ~ talk 06:54, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:46, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Highbeam and other searches return information regarding a contaminated former site (e.g. EPA summary), which should be noted if the article survives. That aside though, I am seeing nothing beyond the level of routine announcements befitting a company going about its business. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 08:47, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – This is probably my fault. I created the article as a redirect to KEMET Corporation, which acquired Cornell Dubilier's foil capacitor business. I didn't realize that C-D continues on as a separate company. I would not object to deletion. We could consider restoring the redirect, but that wouldn't be exactly correct. Kendall-K1 (talk) 14:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 10:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.