Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colonial Blackbird (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. bd2412 T 01:57, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Colonial Blackbird[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional spacecraft, deprodded so we are here. No evidence this passes WP:NFICTION or WP:GNG, no real world significance, sources are all primary/in-universe. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:56, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:17, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/Redirect The argument by Jclemens in the first AfD doesn't sway me in the slightest. It fails GNG and is complete fancruft. Better off removed or redirected to the show article._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 13:44, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article is still in the same state as when I nominated it three years ago. The sources put forth in that AfD were useless in improving it. TTN (talk) 20:23, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per reasons above. --mikeu ^talk 20:58, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There isn't any there there. It doesn't even have any non-primary sources, so no merge is suitable. Rockphed (talk) 15:53, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.