Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chasmology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Yawn. ...yawn.... (non-admin closure) Lourdes 01:38, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chasmology[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As I already said elsewhere [1] unlike e.g. endocrinology, which is a vast and ramified field in which work hundreds of thousands of researchers and specialist practitioners, "chasmology" is a neologism, coined by this guy Walusinski, not in the OED and producing ten (count 'em -- ten!) hits on Gscholar [2] -- one of which is a typo. There's no recognized "science of yawning", and absolutely nothing in this article that wouldn't be completely at home in the yawning article. E Eng 20:38, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Neologism, and all content could easily be included in article on yawning. Neutrality^talk 21:08, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to yawning. Yintan 21:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:09, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

redirect to yawning; neologism. Jytdog (talk) 23:58, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.