Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cat Lord

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Greyhawk characters. (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 03:25, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cat Lord[edit]

Cat Lord (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article currently fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 21:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 21:16, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 21:16, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or merge to List of Greyhawk characters. BOZ (talk) 21:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or merge. No independent coverage. Grayfell (talk) 00:43, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per BOZ. The concept of animal archetypes/personifications has a long history in literature (Death of Rats springs to mind), but I don't really see a way to create an article on such archetypes in D&D, and defer to BOZ' suggested targeting. Jclemens (talk) 04:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:02, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Utter bit of trivia: are article is somewhat wrong. I believe this character started in a piece of fiction in Dragon magazine in the 80s. Good fiction too. But yeah, merge is fine. Hobit (talk) 04:40, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.