Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cancer (comics)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arguments were made that the possible merge target Zodiac (comics), where the character is already covered, likely doesn't pass the WP:GNG either. – sgeureka ^t•c 07:58, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cancer (comics)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional characters TTN (talk) 13:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 13:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 13:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable comic book cruft. Not to mention the confusing nature of the title._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 13:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agreed. Clearly just more non-notable comic book junk.Lovelylinda1980 (talk) 14:04, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge to Zodiac (comics); can be moved to Cancer (Marvel Comics) if necessary. BOZ (talk) 15:06, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: to Zodiac (comics). The rest of the Zodiac can possibly me merged there too. Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 17:58, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can't agree, seeing as A) there is nothing to merge that is notable and B) the "Zodiac" group themselves isn't notable either._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:33, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Merge with Zodiac. Though the side-effect of the latter is that we would have to include the full history of the Zodiac members under the membership section. Right? --Rtkat3 (talk) 18:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Britishfinance (talk) 09:52, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:30, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails NFICTION/GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:51, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge (as above) if there's anything worth keeping, otherwise delete. No evidence of independent notability provided. Josh Milburn (talk) 07:52, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - doesn't pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:28, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This individual character fails to pass the WP:GNG due to a complete lack of significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. The group that has been proposed as a redirect/merge target appears to fail the WP:GNG as well for the same reason. Rorshacma (talk) 07:34, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.