Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CST Complex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Crow^Caw 18:06, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CST Complex[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too technical and complex I could have tagged it but I would like it to be deleted as it cannot be improved enough to make it into a stand alone article Varun FEB2003 17:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep, and I'm tempted to suggest snow close. Varun, please see WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. "Too technical and complex" is not a reason for deletion. There is a perfectly good cleanup template {{Technical}}, but the article has a good authoritative source and is perfectly encyclopedic. Also, it had only been created for two minutes when you sent it here. --Stfg (talk) 17:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request withdrawn I have put up {{Technical}} up there. Let's see. Varun FEB2003 18:03, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Stfg: Pinging Varun FEB2003 18:04, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.