Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruticus (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Decepticons. SoWhy 18:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bruticus[edit]

Bruticus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Transformer character. Sources (in article and in searches) are all in-universe or non-RS Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:53, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E 05:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | Talk 02:37, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge as above. Josh Milburn (talk) 22:44, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or redirect - Notability is not established. TTN (talk) 02:22, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH and WP:GNG. Longevitydude (talk) 20:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as unoriginal research and established notability. Character appears in toys, comics, etc. worth hundreds of dollars per such sources as this, which discuss the character and its value. --24.112.201.254 (talk) 00:07, 18 January 2017 (UTC)Blocked sock. Reyk YO! 05:43, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That's a primary source, it just mentions Bruticus briefly. It's not about him per se, a merge might be appropriate though. Longevitydude (talk) 04:07, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.