Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brown & Crouppen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 20:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brown & Crouppen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough sources to satisfy WP:COMPANY. Drm310 (talk) 16:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:47, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:47, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:47, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails my standards for law firms. They sound like they do good work for tort victims, but I've never heard of any of their lawyers, and none of them have had major leadership positions in the Bar Association of Metro. St. Louis. Bearian (talk) 03:44, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now as my searches at Books, News and browser found nothing convincingly good. SwisterTwister talk 18:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.