Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britai Kridanik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Macross characters. Per nom. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 03:47, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Britai Kridanik[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor fictional character with no real world significance, fails WP:GNG. Deprodded with suggestions of merge to List of Macross characters which no-one has bothered with for months if not years. Suggest soft deletion through redirecting to said list. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:55, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:45, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into or redirect to List of Macross characters seems like the most appropriate response. I am not opposed to the soft deletion and redirecting suggested by the nominator. Aoba47 (talk) 14:53, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 ^{Talk • Edits • Help!} 01:24, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^{(c) (m)}}} 20:40, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.