Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bohan Phoenix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bohan Phoenix[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bohan Phoenix

This article about a musician, known either as Bohan Phoenix or Leng Bohan, does not provide evidence of satisfying musical notability or general notability. Nothing in this article refers to significant coverage by independent sources. Nothing in this article indicates that any of the musical notability criteria have been met. This article was created in article space, then moved to draft space by User:Hey man im josh. Then a Career section was added, and the references, which are interviews, were moved around.

Number	Reference	Remarks	Independent	Significant	Reliable	Secondary
1	npr.org	A guide to performers on their radio shows	No	Yes	Yes	No
2	tonedeaf.thebrag.com	An interview	No	Yes	Yes	No
3	djbooth.net	An interview about his music	No	Yes	Yes	No
4	sinethetamag.medium.com	A combination interview and narrative	No	Yes	Yes	No
5	liftedasia.com	Another combination interview and narrative	No	Yes	Yes	No
6	breakingasia.com	Mostly interview and partly puff piece	No	Yes	Yes	No
7	mixmag.asia	Another interview	No	Yes	Yes	No

It wasn't ready for article space when it was draftified, and it still isn't ready for article space. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, China, and New York. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I found many more sources, like 9 which is not an interview , among many many more sources. This is not including Mandarin sources either. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 00:20, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Clearly notable from a simple before search with articles from The Fader [1], South China Morning Post [2], Billboard [3], Mixmag [4], and more. Suitable for mainspace yet? Debatable. Non-notable? Absolutely not. Why? I Ask (talk) 00:29, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to evaluate new sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:20, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

~~Draftify~~:Change to Keep per excellent HEY. Until something resembling an article can be written. A few words adding up to a paragraph and a half at best, sectioned off, does not stop this from appearing as a WP:PSEUDO biography. There is notability and per Why? I Ask: "Suitable for mainspace yet? Debatable" and the Nom, "It wasn't ready for article space when it was draftified, and it still isn't ready for article space", ~~I agree there is enough concern to draftify until ready. -- Otr500 (talk) 16:05, 23 October 2022 (UTC)~~ -- Otr500 (talk) 01:46, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Otr500 (talk · contribs), I've expanded the article. Cunard (talk) 01:02, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the significant coverage in reliable sources listed by Why? I Ask (talk · contribs), which clearly establish notability per Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. While the article could have been further improved, it was a sourced stub that was suitable for mainspace and should not be draftified after Why? I Ask's improvements. I've expanded the article with the sources already present in the article. The article now is even more clearly suitable for mainspace. Cunard (talk) 01:02, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.