Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Mass (comics)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cadre (comics). Consensus that this article cannot stand on its own, but also that there may be use as a redirect or as a source for material on Cadre (comics); since it's not clear what material could be salvaged I'll apply redirect rather than merge; if people find such material they can copy it over. Regarding the contention that the target article would likely not survive a deletion discussion and that thus no redirect is warranted, that should be tested at AFD and if deletion ensues this redirect would be deleted as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:20, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Black Mass (comics)[edit]

Black Mass (comics) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional topic TTN (talk) 02:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 02:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 02:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ceethekreator (talk) 09:55, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or Merge with Cadre. Almost no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 15:57, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or Redirect to Cadre (comics). As mentioned, there is pretty much no significant converge in reliable secondary sources. He is already covered in the main article on the team he appeared in, so while I would technically support a Redirect, that target article also consists only of primary sourced plot detail, and would likely not survive an AFD itself. So, I would be fine if this was just deleted now, as well. Rorshacma (talk) 16:48, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.