Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bison (comics)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Masters of Evil members. As noted in the discussion the article is not backed by any RS sources. Which means it fails WP:V and there is nothing to merge. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:51, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bison (comics)[edit]

Bison (comics) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. Is linked by three non-list articles in passing mention. Character appears eight times, according to Marvel Wikia. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 17:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • redirect to List of Masters of Evil members. Valid search term, no other likely target, no real info worth preserving. --Killer Moff (talk) 13:48, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Let his page stay. While he has appeared eight times, he might appear again. Plus, he is one of a few characters that make up the category page for fictional bison. As for BOZ's claim if this gets merged, it will have to be in the list of Marvel Comics characters that start with B or the section for Crimson Cowl's first incarnation of the Masters of Evil on it's list page. --Rtkat3 (talk) 19:15, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to List of Masters of Evil members. Has absolutely zero reliable secondary sources to show any sort of notability. The arguments that "he might appear again" or that the page is part of a category are both complete non-policy arguments for keeping, and should be disregarded. 169.232.162.112 (talk) 17:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.