Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asher Quinn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:56, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Asher Quinn[edit]

Asher Quinn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be non-notable; subject has edited the article adding massive amounts of uncited detail; I searched for sources and found only one review. Skyerise (talk) 19:11, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Available sourcing (both in the article and on my searches) does not provide significant coverage in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject and therefore the article fails to meet the general notability guideline. Even if such coverage were to exist, the article is entirely and blatantly promotional, and would need to be redone from scratch to have any hope of being encyclopaedic. Jack Frost (talk) 09:53, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete does not meet WP:SINGER. A WP:BEFORE reveals no RS giving the artist coverage. I concur with Jack Frost that the article seems promotional. The usernames of some of the editors of the article also give me a concern for WP:COI. These are the only sources I can find discussing him and none of them appear to be reliable: [1], [2], [3],[4] Vladimir.copic (talk) 07:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.