Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arms of Kismet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:05, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Arms of Kismet[edit]
- Arms of Kismet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable band, no coverage in reliable sources, fails WP:BAND. doomgaze (talk) 20:41, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Lacks coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:02, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 01:51, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 01:13, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete as failing WP:BAND. Their second album was reviewed by Allmusic; other than that, I've found nothing to indicate notability. It's a shame; I'm listening to some of their stuff right now, and I kind of like their sound. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 10:15, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.