Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Louise Boyvin d'Hardancourt Brillon de Jouy
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Notability is there, just needs content. Tagged with {{expand}} also. (non-admin closure) treelo radda 00:50, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Anne Louise Boyvin d'Hardancourt Brillon de Jouy[edit]
- Anne Louise Boyvin d'Hardancourt Brillon de Jouy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Independent notability not established; neither being an aristocrat nor a friend of someone famous is adequate for this- notability is not inherited. Playing the harpsichord, however well, does not satisfy WP:MUSICIAN on its own, although I'm sure she could lay down a mean riff. Rodhullandemu 21:33, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. -- John Vandenberg (chat) 22:19, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. -- John Vandenberg (chat) 22:19, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am not at all knowledgeable with the notability guidelines for composers (although, I did just now read them); and do not believe I can make a valid argument either way. I do note that she is mentioned in the Norton Grove Dictionary of Women Composers, but I don't know how to interpret the "reasonable length" criterion of the notability guidelines. Regards, Lazulilasher (talk) 00:10, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. A Google Books search [1] would appear to indicate that she was a notable composer/musician in her day, and notability does not expire. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:54, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and tag for expansion -- This article is little more than an unreferenced stub. It is categorised as "Women composers", but the text does not even state that she was a composer. Her relationship with Franklin is interesting, but does not establish her notability (and that is all the article covers so far). However, her status as a composer might do so. Her appearance in Grove is probably an indication that she is notable, but the article does not deal with that. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:39, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.