Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Dunham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. per WP:SNOW, notability is also established - Milk's Favorite Cookie 01:53, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ann Dunham[edit]

Not notable enough. --Philip Stevens (talk) 19:02, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - "Not notable enough" is not a very enthusiastic afd. WP:BIO says A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. At this writing I see 22 third party references in the article itself. She helped her son write a bestselling book and she is discussed in the book. You have to be living under a rock to think that she is not being discussed almost daily given Obama's mixed parentage.Americasroof (talk) 19:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The immediate parents of major political figures often have sufficient notability. Dunham has seen significant coverage, and is not an exception. Jfire (talk) 19:37, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Jfire's argument. --Kristjan Wager (talk) 20:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Sli723 (talk) 22:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Jfire. JJL (talk) 23:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.