Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankur Sharma (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz Read! Talk! 05:10, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ankur Sharma[edit]

Ankur Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find sourcing that discusses this individual, could perhaps redirect to the political party he founded. No sourcing for GNG or NBIO. Oaktree b (talk) 04:32, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:13, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:10, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep/Redirect (party page) being an Indian I see it at the personal level this person seems notable as he’s founded political party which does have seats being the party president/founder he gets to have an article on the Wikipedia under politics project on wikipedia, but He doesn’t have independent articles as everything in the news for him comes along with his party. Autograph (talk) 07:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also the creator of this article seems highly experienced, also I have added 2 new sources. Autograph (talk) 07:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. He hasn't held any political position that would constitute an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL, but the article is not referenced to anything like enough coverage about him to claim that he would pass WP:GNG in lieu of having to pass NPOL. Bearcat (talk) 14:10, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.