Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative versions of Psylocke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:30, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative versions of Psylocke[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing that suggests any of these alternate universe versions are encyclopedically notable. Only of interest to comic-book fans, and sourced solely from comic books. All the alternate versions are catalogued here, so there is no need to transwiki or anything, it should just be deleted as fancruft. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:17, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:29, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:29, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - it's crufty, but that's not a reason to delete. The size of the interested audience does not determine notability. Merging into the character's article is not feasible, as the combined size would automatically qualify for a size split. Argento Surfer (talk) 20:40, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Since I suppose my nomination was phrased in a way that was unclear, I revised it. I never meant to suggest that the audience size was grounds for deletion, it's simply non-notable._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:19, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Violates WP:NOTPLOT. Only in-universe plot summary, no third-party coverage. Sandstein 09:37, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Appears to be referenced entirely to the comics, no secondary coverage. Szzuk (talk) 12:22, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Argento Surfer, or failing that merge a heavily summarized version into Psylocke. BOZ (talk) 17:14, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no secondary coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 23:07, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.