Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aerialbots

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Autobots. MBisanz ^talk 01:43, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aerialbots[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character grouping does not establish notability. There do not appear to be any significant sources that could be added. TTN (talk) 20:14, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 20:14, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to List of Autobots. BOZ (talk) 23:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 17:29, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question to the nominator: you've already nominated Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Predacons for deletion. Do you intend to nominate List of Autobots as well? If so, merging this there seems pointless. Argento Surfer (talk) 21:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:18, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per above Buttons0603 (talk) 15:51, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Autobots for the reasons stated above. Aoba47 (talk) 21:29, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.