User talk:Zenon Pavonia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Zenon Pavonia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Citi Bike. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! epicgenius (talk) 02:03, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New York Red Bulls[edit]

Can you please add me to the list of autoconfirmed users for the New York Red Bulls page?

NYMetro96 (talk) 23:57, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Zenon Pavonia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Check this out[edit]

Some content you contributed to is being considered for discussion for destruction at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 February 3 Trackinfo (talk) 07:44, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sports in New York City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Women's Hockey League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Changes of Trump to Drumpf[edit]

Your recent edit to the article for Jersey City, New Jersey made several accurate changes to population estimates but also included four instances where "Trump" was changed to "Drumpf". Was this an error? Alansohn (talk) 22:16, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies[edit]

Yes it was. I have a widget on my browser that changes his name to Drumpf automatically. When I was editing it must have did that. My apologies. Zenon Pavonia (talk) 04:36, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happened again in Jersey City, can you correct it please?Djflem (talk) 20:29, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Has been corrected. Removed widget to prevent it from happening again. Thanks for heads up.

Lists of soccer games[edit]

Generally, lists of games played at a specific stadium aren't appropriate, mainly because most stadiums would have significantly long lists not only for special events, but those of the main tenant(s) too. We don't list playoff games for the stadium's main tenant, so why should details be included of every international match played there? If the match is part of a specific season, then the general details will be listed on the appropriate season article; if it's part of a tournament, then it will be listed at the tournament article. While a paragraph can certainly be included that mentions some of the international teams and events that have played there, listing every game, along with details of every game is beyond the WP:SCOPE of the article. Further, it's part of WP:NOT in that Wikipedia is not an encyclopedia of everything. Stadiums host a ton of events. The point of these kinds of articles is to give a thorough, yet still general, overview of the facility as a whole, not the details of every event (or even the details of certain types of events) ever held there. --JonRidinger (talk) 16:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Zenon Pavonia. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Soccer[edit]

There is no hostility to soccer in US stadium articles; the "hostility" is towards listing details about every soccer game ever played at a particular stadium, which is not what the articles are for. I, and other editors, are the same way about listing every NFL game at Wembley Stadium or something similar. Stadium articles are about the facility, not details about every event ever held there. The MetLife Stadium article suffers from a number of inappropriate charts and excessive detail, including the college football games, soccer games, and concerts. Mentioning some of the most significant games and events is, of course, expected and encouraged, but every game/event along with details like revenue, flag icons, etc., is not. We don't mention every NFL game (or even every playoff game) played at MetLife, so why should we mention and document every international soccer game ever played there or every concert? And this goes for any stadium article; mentioning some of the notable international soccer matches at a stadium is most certainly OK, but not infoboxes with flag icons and game details. Those kinds of details are appropriate for articles on specific tournaments or for an article on the game itself. If the game isn't significant enough for its own article and isn't part of a notable tournament (like the Gold Cup or World Cup), then the details certainly shouldn't be at the stadium article. --JonRidinger (talk) 18:42, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Asbury Park as "Dark City"[edit]

This edit adds "The Dark City" as a nickname for Asbury Park, New Jersey. The source provided is from a brewery that uses the name, which makes it a somewhat questionable (and promotional) reference. I can't find independent reliable and verifiable sources that support the claim. Do you have anything that would be an appropriate source?

It mentions in the article that they named themselves after the City’s nickname.

https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Asbury-Park-nicknamed-the-Dark-City

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=dark%20city

These two links to the question of “What is Asbury Park’s nickname?”. There is no news source sourcing the nickname. It seems to be a more colloquial and not official nickname.

Zenon Pavonia (talk) 16:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is this website blog “New Jersey Isn’t Boring” that also references the brewery using the nickname “Dark City” in it’s review of the brewery.

http://newjerseyisntboring.com/dark-city-brewing-co-asbury-park-review/ Zenon Pavonia (talk) 16:16, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I also found a Wikipedia page “List of City Nicknames in New Jersey” and it has “The Dark City” listed as it there and cites an article from 2010 of the Atlantic Highlands Herald. I am going to add that citation to the Dark City nickname info box on the Asbury Park page.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_city_nicknames_in_New_Jersey

https://www.ahherald.com/newsbrief-mainmenu-2/artsculture-mainmenu-85/8777-annual-artscap-event-features-author-hisani-dubose Zenon Pavonia (talk) 17:09, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Your edit to Jersey City Armory has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Even if the content is attributed you can't just copypaste from sources, you have to write it in your own words. Wizardman 15:11, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]