User talk:Wee Curry Monster/Archive 16
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 |
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, March 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:15, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, April 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXCIII, May 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXCIV, June 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:43, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Fifteenth anniversary on Wikipedia!
 | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Wee Curry Monster! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy 15th anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! Chris Troutman (talk) 13:47, 4 July 2022 (UTC) |  |
Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society
Dear Wee Curry Monster/Archive 16,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 13:47, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXCVI, July 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 20:29, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXCVII, August 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:00, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
My source selection
Hi WCM. I was going to reply in the thread itself but thought I'd do so here in order to further avoid cluttering it. In one of your comments you claimed I "appear to be giving selective credence to sources that support your own viewpoint rather than giving a balanced view of the literature"
. This suggestion is incorrect. Of the three sources I examined, two were already in the section and are excellent scholarly sources. I turned to a third source, a collection of essays on the topic, because I own it. I purchased it because academic reviewers have praised it for its diversity and even-handedness, e.g. [1] [2]. I explained why I rejected a fourth source (the 1948 one): its age and closeness to events. If you think this combination of sources is skewed, please share an alterative scholarly source and I'll be happy to review it. Jr8825 • Talk 15:41, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Please keep discussion centralised, there may be others who wished to respond. My problem is not with your sources, its the non-neutral language you're using in your edits. The sources would also support more neutral phrasing, yes it might be in one's self-interest to avoid conflict but that is a rather jaundiced way to describe such a motive. WCMemail 17:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, September 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:32, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, October 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXCIX, November 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:33, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CC, December 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Eight years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:00, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 201, January 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:46, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 202, February 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
TPG
Hi - you're right that refactoring other people's comments on talk pages is generally frowned upon. However, I'll note two things. First, that amendment to a comment that had already been replied to was itself inappropriate. Second, the account I was reverting is the sock of a blocked (and globally banned) user. I was in the middle of rolling back a bunch of their contributions to discussions, simply to avoid wasting people's time in replying to them, but I guess in that case it would be more useful to simply close the discussion, which I will now do. Girth Summit (blether) 13:06, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- OK I was unaware of that when it popped up on my watchlist. I would comment that striking through and editing a comment has always been allowed. since it does allow for the narrative to be maintained. Whilst the editor concerned ma have been disruptive they have raised a pertinent point on the article. WCMemail 13:09, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Striking through, yes; adding new assertions to comments that have been responded to, not really unless you're going to mark it as 'inserted' (WP:TALK#REPLIED). Anyway, it's no biggie - so long as you guys are discussing what to do with the article, and give no weight to the sock's comments, that's fine. (I haven't actually checked to see what the article is about, so have no view on the matter.) Girth Summit (blether) 13:25, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 203, March 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:30, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 204, April 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:30, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:35, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 206, June 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:31, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Your template
I'm curious to know how you created your template "User:Wee Curry Monster/talk", especially the line about the current time of day. :) ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 22:59, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- TBH I cribbed it from my very good friend Dave1185 and then modified it how I wanted it, feel free to copy it if you find it useful. WCMemail 06:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ah, yes, Dave1185. We used to have some lively discussions. What I'm talking about is your template that includes the line "Please note that it is Crystal Clear app clock.svg 6:55 AM (GMT), where I live". That comes from a template called User:Wee Curry Monster/talk, which I would indeed like to copy and customize - but I can't figure out how to get to it! ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 07:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Please note that it is 
11:23 AM (GMT)
Adjust it for your timezone by adding the offset from GMT to replace the final 0 and you can customise it with whatever image you like from commons. WCMemail 07:11, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- That seems to work well. I still don't know how to create a template, but at least I have the current time posted now. Thank you for your help. :) ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 11:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 207, July 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:58, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Falkland
Could you help verify this source [3] for ROC supporting the UK against Argentina's claim ? CurryCity (talk) 23:05, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- @CurryCity: the original link no longer appears to exist and is redirected to a list of bulletins from the Taiwanese foreign office. That's not to say it didn't previously back in 2013 but it would take some work to find the bulletin. See WP:LINKROT. According to archive.org, back in 2013, it would have verified [4]. I'm curious what prompted this, was it my revert of your CELAC edit? WCMemail 06:14, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- Argentina raises this constantly, but it became notable this time with EU's language, at least that's what prompted my edit on CELAC. While reading over that section, I saw the ROC sentence; I had no idea they even held a position on this. CurryCity (talk) 05:58, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- It didn't the EU denied it had made any change in position, its unusual for diplomats to actually state the other side has misrepresented their position as in this case. It may in the future become notable for Argentina annoying the EU and delaying any agreement with Mercosur due to a lack of trust in the negotiations. Right now, just another example of Argentina touting a non-event as a diplomatic breakthrough. The same will happen next week and the next. WCMemail 06:09, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- Argentina raises this constantly, but it became notable this time with EU's language, at least that's what prompted my edit on CELAC. While reading over that section, I saw the ROC sentence; I had no idea they even held a position on this. CurryCity (talk) 05:58, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 208, August 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jason Islands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Davis. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
I'm afraid you are completely wrong on this one. You need to read Lady#British titles, which sets out the details. Lady Hunt was not the daughter of an earl, marquess or duke, which would have granted her the title before her first name. Her title only came to her as a courtesy because her husband was knighted. It is certainly true that many people get this wrong, and she may have been referred to in some poor sources as "Lady Mavis", but Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a perpetuator of inaccurate information. -- Necrothesp (talk) 07:23, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- The article talk page is the place to be having this discussion not my talk page, other than the usual vandalism, I rarely revert anyone but when I do so I'm guided by reference to sources. What I found was sources overwhelmingly referred to her as Lady Mavis Hunt. Hence, I was disappointed to see you'd simply reverted rather than starting the talk page discussion, if you open the discussion and consensus is in your favour then that is the time to update the article per WP:BRD. WCMemail 07:46, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- This is not a discussion on a particular individual, but on a basic error which has already been pointed out to you and which has been fully explained in the appropriate article. But, if you'd rather perpetuate inaccuracies than fact on Wikipedia then good luck to you. I can find plenty of sources that refer to her as Lady Mavis. I can also find plenty that refer to her correctly as Lady Hunt. Not sure why you have decided to go with the former. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:58, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 209, September 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:37, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 210, October 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of British possession
Hi, Wee Curry Monster, where do I find the discussion for the proposed deletion? I've never participated in one before and I'm a bit confused. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks! Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 14:34, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- I've used WP:PROD, unless there is an objection it will be deleted within 7 days, without discussion. If contested I will raise at WP:AFD and invite you to comment as you expressed an interest. WCMemail 14:37, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 14:46, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 211, November 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Neutrality Tag Discussion
Just wanted to apologize for making a new section, I didn't recognize your signature as your username. Apologies. - AquilaFasciata (talk | contribs) 17:15, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- No problems, it happens, I appreciate you reaching out to apologise. WCMemail 17:26, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 212, December 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:00, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
| |
| Nine years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 213, January 2024
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
3RR Note
Hi,
I'm going to take it from this that you're aware that you're on 3RR - as he is. Maybe avoid any more reverts and let's have the conversation on talk. Cheers, Kahastok talk 20:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 214, February 2024
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you
I just read your closing remark. Very well put. Needless to say, it was a relief when you showed up. But you're right that the talk page has become toxic, and I too have withdrawn, at least until the protection is lifted. Hopefully your (and Elemimele's) suggestion will be heeded and the page will be carefully stewarded forward in line with BLP. My sense is that we're fighting people who think his bio just isn't hinting strongly enough that he's a misogynist. I thought about appending something along those lines to your comment. But I think your statement is an excellent place to leave it. Once again, you have my thanks. Thomas B (talk) 17:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks again for your efforts. I'll be on my way. It will be interesting to see what happens with the page now.Thomas B (talk) 19:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I'm not sure if you're familiar with WP:SDNONE, but it effectively says that if an article title is self-explanatory, the short description should be set to none. Short descriptions are meant to provide additional context (where required) to article titles. However, the short description you reinstated is actually less descriptive than the article title, so is not appropriate. Cheers, Number 57 15:42, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- OK no worries, I'd thought it was removed by the new editor, thanks. WCMemail 16:54, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 215, March 2024
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:57, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Contentious topics notifications
You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:19, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:19, 28 March 2024 (UTC)