User talk:SenfBaum
_
_
useful links if you like to read, but for fast answers to quick questions, the WP:TEAHOUSE is the friendliest place to begin
|
|---|
Welcome![edit]Hello, SenfBaum, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Leif Aare, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained. There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Staffwaterboy Critique Me 20:00, 18 October 2013 (UTC) |
buncha template spam
|
|---|
Speedy deletion nomination of Leif Aare[edit]
A tag has been placed on Leif Aare requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Staffwaterboy Critique Me 20:00, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of "Adriano da Bologna"[edit]You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. Thank you. 🍺 Antiqueight confer 23:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of "Greta Adrian"[edit]You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. Thank you. 🍺 Antiqueight confer 23:04, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 The article Greta Adrian has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:52, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
The article Greta Adrian has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Deletion discussion about Aneboda fisheries school[edit]Hello, SenfBaum, I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Aneboda fisheries school should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aneboda fisheries school . If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. Thanks, Vanjagenije (talk) 00:35, 25 January 2014 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Josef Anér[edit]
A tag has been placed on Josef Anér requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. BiH (talk) 18:20, 25 January 2014 (UTC) Hello, SenfBaum. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sven Anér, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Sven Anér to be deleted, please add a reference to the article. If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page. Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 19:32, 25 January 2014 (UTC) The article Anelghowhat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Speedy deletion nomination of Anerosi[edit]Hello SenfBaum, I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Anerosi for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ColonelHenry (talk) 05:22, 27 January 2014 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Attack battle[edit]
A tag has been placed on Attack battle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 14:25, 31 January 2014 (UTC) |
You don't seem to be having much luck[edit]
We all have trouble when we start. We find it hard to judge what is valid here and how best to work. May I suggest you read this essay which is intended for new users and has been found to be helpful? Fiddle Faddle 13:38, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Your edits[edit]
Hi SenfBaum: I applaud your energy in writing new articles, and the English Wikipedia does need more articles about Sweden and its history. However, there are a couple of big problems with your editing here. One is that your English is not very good. For example, Anecdotes de Suède is not at all clear. I have also seen you replacing the start of articles with versions that are far less clear English - for example, at Angary and at Angantyr. You give the impression of translating from somewhere. Instead, you need to state the essential facts as simply as possible. For example, when was Les anecdotes de Suède first published; who wrote it or is believed to have written it; and what is it? Use short, complete sentences. That way, others can understand what you are saying and polish your English as necessary. Secondly, you are not providing references. What is the source of your information? For example, Aneboda fisheries school was deleted. Where did you get the information to write that article? If it had had a couple of references, it would probably not have been deleted; colleges are very rarely deleted if they can be shown to exist. I did not see that nomination, for which I apologise; I might have been able to save the article. But why did you not add any sources after it was nominated for deletion? (I am an administrator here, so I can see the deleted article.) Why did you not participate at the deletion discussion? The English Wikipedia has a higher requirement for sources than some other-language Wikipedias, and you should go back and add at least one source to all your articles. You also do not appear to have made any edits to user talk pages (such as this one, your own where people leave messages for you; do you know you can respond?) or article talk pages (in particular, when an article is nominated for speedy deletion, you can click a button on the template labelled "Contest this speedy deletion", which opens an edit on the article talk page for you to explain why it should not be speedy deleted). There are also various ways to ask for help: you can ask a question here and then copy this: {{Help me}}; you can go to a help page - I recommend the Teahouse, which is a place where friendly Wikipedians assist new editors and answer their questions about how the project works; you can click on the link in my signature or that of any of the other editors who have left messages here, to ask a question on one of our talk pages. None of these are required. But sources are required, and good English is important. So I'm offering you this advice in hopes it will help. (By the way I can read Swedish, but cannot write it. So if you ask me a question in Swedish, I will have to answer in English. Several editors here are more bilingual than me; two of them who I happen to know are Bishonen and Hafspajen.) Yngvadottir (talk) 17:20, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, well, worked a little on Anecdotes de Suède. Hafspajen (talk) 23:33, 1 February 2014 (UTC)And hope for my 5th barnstar some day...
howdy[edit]
Sorry about the rough welcome. This is a hazing ritual that content contributors like yourself must undergo. Deletionists systematically eliminate all traces of your work. Thankfully nothing is actually lost... you can use WP:REFUND to get back all your work, or just ask Yngvadottir, they are a big meanie. They are an admin around here, and can magically retrieve "deleted" pages (which are actually just "hidden" from us non-admins ... see hazing ritual which I belive I've mentioned before).
The wikiCulture sucks right now, but I'm working on fixing up the place, so that the template-spammers and the officious-types don't have all the power. Which means I would *dearly* like to welcome you to wikipedia. :-) Because you seem like a content-contributor, and that is exactly what we need around here. Timtrent/FiddleFaddle, Yngvadottir/TheKvemperor, and Hafspajen/NotMandy can show you the ropes, and explain how to whip up on the deletionists, it's not hard if you follow a few simple procedures. I'm also happy to help in any way I can, you can reply to me here, or leave me a note at my own page (click 'talk' by my name, then click 'new section' at the top, type your message, and click 'save').
If you decide to re-create your articles, the best way to do it nowadays is called WP:AfC, which is off-limits for deletionists most of the time. Yngvadottir can probably recommend which article to start out with, as being most likely to succeed. Once you have a bit of practice under your belt, you'll be able to jam articles directly into mainspace without worry of deletion. Hope this helps, and thanks for improving wikipedia, it is appreciated. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 13:39, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
the river[edit]
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Angara_River&diff=prev&oldid=593362860
Original:
The Angara River (Buryat Mongolian:Ангар, Angar (open or cleft); Russian: Ангара́, IPA: [ɐngɐˈra]) is a 1,779-kilometer-long (1,105 mi) river in Irkutsk Oblast and Krasnoyarsk Krai, south-east Siberia, Russia. It is the river that drains Lake Baikal, and is the headwater tributary of the Yenisei River.[1] Leaving Lake Baikal near the settlement of Listvyanka (at 51°52′01″N 104°49′05″E / 51.867°N 104.818°E), the Angara flows north past the Irkutsk Oblast's cities of Irkutsk, Angarsk, Bratsk, and Ust-Ilimsk. It then turns west, enters the Krasnoyarsk Krai, and falls into the Yenisei near Strelka (at 58°06′07″N 92°59′28″E / 58.102°N 92.991°E, 40 km south-east of Lesosibirsk). Below its junction with the Ilim River, the Angara has been known in the past as the Upper Tunguska ([Верхняя Тунгуска, Verkhnyaya Tunguska] Error: {{Lang-xx}}: text has italic markup (help)).[2][3] Confusingly, some maps (e.g., 1773 atlas by Kitchen – see illustration) referred to this same section of the Angara as Nizhnyaya Tunguska, i.e. the Lower Tunguska – the name that is currently applied to another river.
References
- ^ "Angara River". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Retrieved 2006-10-26.
- ^ ВЕРХНЯЯ ТУНГУСКА (Verkhnyaya Tunguska, in the dictionary of Russia's place names).
- ^ Tunguska, in Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia
Your changes:
The Angara river is a tributary of the Yenisei in Siberia, Russian Federation. The length is 2 820 km, and the catchment area is 1 056 000 km². The river source is Selenge, which is coming from Mongolia and flows into Lake Baikal. Angara is the drain to Lake Baital and flows first through Irkutsk, where several ponds are with a total vertical drop of 56 m. Further down at Bratsk and Ust-Ilimsk there are large dams and hydropower plants at 106 and 90 m vertical drop. The joint installed capacity totaling 8 380 MW. Bratsk reservoir area is 5 500 km². The regulations are believed to have led to water level variations in Lake Baital as damaged fish stocks.
Some deletionist noticed your changes, and got rid of them entirely, with an automated-deletion-wiki-tool. This was unfortunate, as some of what you did was an improvement. Of course, you also made some changes that I disagree with, such as deleting 3 sources. :-) You can post a message to Talk:Angara River explaining your approach, or you can also get advice on the rewrite here from Yngvadottir && FiddleFaddle. (Don't take Hafspajen's advice... they would just complain that there are no pictures of beautiful landscapes. ;-) HTH. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 13:39, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Ways to improve Angarn[edit]
Hi, I'm MrNiceGuy1113. SenfBaum, thanks for creating Angarn!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. references & a little elaboration can work wonders for your article. best regds
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 16:20, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Anecdotes de Suède[edit]
 | On 14 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Anecdotes de Suède, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Anecdotes de Suède, a polemic against the Swedish regime of the 1680s, appeared in French, German, and English before finally being published in Swedish in 1822? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Anecdotes de Suède. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks for this one Victuallers (talk) 15:14, 14 February 2014 (UTC)