User talk:SURAJKAITHWAS009

May 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Raebareli have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 09:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lucknow. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Malihabad, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 09:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lucknow. - Arjayay (talk) 09:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Raebareli, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 19:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Raebareli shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Arjayay (talk) 19:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster _talk 19:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lucknow. - Arjayay (talk) 14:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]