User talk:Princessbrocoli

August 2022

Hello, I'm Binksternet. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The End of an Era, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 19:38, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Keys II

Regarding your edits to the above article they have been undone for the following reasons:

1. Deltaplex News says "Alicia Keys dropped off the music video for “Come For Me,” featuring Lucky Daye and Khalid. The song is one of two new singles included on the deluxe double album Keys II, expected August 12.
2. Target call "Come for Me" Key's new single
3. Wonderland says Alicia Keys collaborates with Khalid and Lucky Daye in a lucid, sensual and mesmerising new single, “Come For Me”.

If a song is called a single by reliable sources and is treated like one e.g. precedes the release of an album, gets at least one form of release e.g. streaming via YouTube then there's a good chance it's a single. WP:DUCK. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 19:57, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

"Lowest charting studio album"

The album only just debuted. Is this really worth nothing? It's not an uncommon thing. For most artists, Christmas albums are their lowest-charting. It just seems like adding little bits like this is trying to find something to say about it. Ss112 00:53, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

All wikipedia pages should be edited with the most details that one individual can find. I found that Santa Baby is her lowest peaking studio album thus far, so i placed it in its wikipedia page so people knew that this was her lowest charting. So, every detail put into Wikipedia is worth something. Princessbrocoli (talk) 08:24, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Princessbrocoli! Your additions to It Is Finished have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 15:17, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)