User talk:MethylC5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Information icon Hello, MethylC5. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Welcome![edit]

Hi MethylC5! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

January 2023[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Endurance training. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Please slow down and clear this with your course instructor and at WP:HELP. Looks like plagiarism to me. Zefr (talk) 02:21, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

With "plagiarism" perhaps you were referring to the images used. I have only used images from Wikimedia that were properly attributed there. There were no other possible plagiarisms I am aware of. I am not a student. MethylC5 (talk) 14:14, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The entire section you added reads like an excerpt from a book or journal - see WP:NOTJOURNAL #6-8. It was highly developed, but more like expert content rather than a presentation for the encyclopedia. See WP:MEDMOS, section on audience. The content also was not appropriate as subtopics of physiology. Zefr (talk) 17:49, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree it was too highly developed. I had just tried to become expert in this new area of interest of mine. MethylC5 (talk) 20:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Skeletal muscle into Epigenetics of physical exercise. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:49, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Trinucleotide repeat disorder, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:47, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Life and copyright violation[edit]

Hi, you addition toLife [1] was copied from "Aging, Sex, and DNA Repair" by Bozzano G Luisa/ Dec 2012 · Academic Press. This is not allowed and you edit has been reverted. Please read Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Graham Beards (talk) 15:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]