User talk:Jameskrouse

January 2009[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you again remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles, as you did to Devon Reiff, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you will be blocked from editing. Tagishsimon (talk) 19:12, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion about the notability of a couple of articles you've added. I'm going to take them both through the articles for deletion process to get the community to check them. Let me be very clear with you: if you remove tags from either article, you will be barred from the site for a period of time. --Tagishsimon (talk) 19:14, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Devon Reiff[edit]

I have nominated Devon Reiff, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devon Reiff. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Tagishsimon (talk) 19:15, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Paul Callan (attorney)[edit]

I have nominated Paul Callan (attorney), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Callan (attorney). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Tagishsimon (talk) 19:18, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Devon Reiff[edit]

A tag has been placed on Devon Reiff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 19:44, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Refs on Paul Callan (attorney)[edit]

FYI, the references you added to the above article were removed (by another user), since neither of the sites used is considered a reliable source. See WP:RELIABLE. --Tagishsimon (talk) 20:19, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Devon reiff.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Devon reiff.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:35, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets[edit]

PinDesign (talk · contribs) You must surely know, if you have to resort to ballot stuffing, that you've lost your case. How do you live with yourself? At what point did you consign honesty in favour of selfish expediency? --Tagishsimon (talk) 09:11, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Attack[edit]

The above entry is a personal attack Tagishsimon (talk · contribs) has clearly over stepped the boundaries of discussion. This has not only impacted the tone of this discussion but it has, in my opinion, clouded his judgment in disputing my entries. --Jameskrouse (talk) 18:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Learn what a WP:NPA is. The above comment is a well structured comment. --Numyht (talk) 13:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You might also retake logic 101. I had long since put up the NN articles for deletion before you resorted to sockpuppetry. How your subsequent gerrymandering affects the prior decision to AfD the articles is beyond me. Anyway: they're both gone now, and good riddance to them. --Tagishsimon (talk) 17:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Really? There has been no sockpuppetry. I'm not sure how you can accuse someone of that with no evidence. Also, I do think that your disagreement about one entry has clouded flagging another. Paul Callan is a national television figure as is readily evident by a simple search on the internet or turning on CNN. The idea of a civil debate in here on these merits is clearly beyond you. I don't mind if we disagree on things but honestly 'gerrymandering' 'how can you live with yourself?' you're sitting on a pretty high horse when you say things like that.--Jameskrouse (talk) 15:35, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DUCK, troll. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:11, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]