Jump to content

User talk:JamesClifton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of psychotherapies, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --jnivekk (talk) 04:26, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Redirection therapy, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.redirectiontherapy.org/information.html. As a copyright violation, Redirection therapy appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Redirection therapy has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Redirection therapy and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Redirection therapy with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Redirection therapy.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. The very model of a minor general (talk) 22:44, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please have a look at WP:COI. The very model of a minor general (talk) 22:44, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


AfD nomination of Redirection therapy[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Redirection therapy, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redirection therapy. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? The very model of a minor general (talk) 10:09, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Redecision Therapy[edit]

A tag has been placed on Redecision Therapy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. DustiSPEAK!! 02:36, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Etiquette[edit]

  1. Please sign your posts on talk pages, using ~~~~. Please have a look at Wikipedia:Signature.
  2. The right place to discuss the proposed deletion of Redirection therapy is Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Redirection_therapy, not Talk:Redirection therapy.

--The very model of a minor general (talk) 11:30, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adding links to articles[edit]

Regarding your edits adding external links to cognitive therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy and Reality Therapy, please see WP:ADVERT. -- The Anome (talk) 18:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. SJP (talk) 05:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Cognitive therapy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Livitup (talk) 05:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Reality Therapy. Oroso (talk) 05:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "WIKIPEDIA UNFAIR"[edit]

A page you created, WIKIPEDIA UNFAIR, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. Livitup (talk) 05:22, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Modern Whig Party[edit]

A tag has been placed on Modern Whig Party, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. NuclearWarfare (talk) 03:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Alexf42 06:10, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JamesClifton (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What did I do wrong? How is adding legitimate links vandalism?

Decline reason:

You were given numerous warnings, and chose to ignore them. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

At the risk of being banned again, I want some clarification, please. Other than a few juvenile intentional vandalisms on a couple pages, what did I do that was wrong. I don't understand how adding a link to the Modern Whig Party on the Whig Party site is vandalism. The Modern Whig Party is a legitimate party that has more members than a number of parties that has Wikipedia entries.

I don't understand how adding a link to two therapeutic modalities on the List of Psychotherapies Wikipedia pages is vandalism. This page contains numerous psychotherapy modalities that have no web sites or have been very, very controversial.

I am not being difficult. I just don't understand this whole process. Again, I am just trying to figure this out and I do humbly apologize for the intentional vandalisms. I am sorry.

Thank you,

James W. Clifton

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JamesClifton (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did nothing wrong after the final warning. I simply added some legitimate external links to some Wikipedia entries. Thanks, James W. Clifton

Decline reason:

I would believe you except for this, pretty clearly at odds with WP:EL — Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your editing has been causing problems. When your block expires, I suggest you seek mentorship through WP:ADOPT. Good intentions are not a substitute for knowing how things work here. — Jehochman Talk 04:40, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of American Free Soil Party[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on American Free Soil Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. GB fan 14:19, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: American Free Soil Party (April 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:17, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: American Free Soil Party[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
JamesClifton (talk) 22:34, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I am struggling trying to figure all this out. My submission, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/American_Free_Soil_Party, was declined. I don't quite understand why. We are a brand new Party and there are no references yet. This is a Party I created. Please help me understand how our submission is any different from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veterans_Party_of_America

Thank you very much,

Pastor James W. Clifton April 18, 2014 JamesClifton (talk) 22:34, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If it's something you just created, it's not allowed to have an article on Wikipedia. See WP:NOTMADEUP. Please don't submit it anymore; it will just waste both your time and that of our reviewers. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:40, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Free Soil Party concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Free Soil Party, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Free Soil Party[edit]

Hello JamesClifton. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "American Free Soil Party".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Free Soil Party}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JamesClifton&oldid=1143075350"