User talk:ImmortalYawn

December 2009

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Reconsider! 01:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Crucifixion in art, you will be blocked from editing. --Tryptofish (talk) 01:54, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Crucifixion_in_art#Anime_section

Removed most of the anime references from the In Pop culture section. Graphic Novels from various cultures, as stated at the start of that section more than sums it up, but I have left some further reference there and generally pared it down. And as mentioned above; the pages relevant to the references removed already discuss these points, and there are links to sources and such without having to state them in the article section itself.

Please take a look at the barrenness and lack of information of the other sections of this article, I think that says more than i could about the state of Wikipedia right now.

The addition of anime, and other trivial information, to a LOT of pages, whether through “In Popular Culture” additions or other spurious ways, is a key reason Wikipedia is not taken as seriously as it could be.

The prolific infestation of specific “internet cultures” and other minor groups – big maybe on the internet and certainly in the editorial staff here, but trivial and pointless in a scholarly sense – detracts from the resource as a whole.

Where someone with actual information misses out on having a chance to share it, X number of editors get to water down a page with their own trivial crap, or moderate it for their own purposes. This is why I and many others will never donate, This is why Wikipedia is NOT taken seriously. _ImmortalYawn|Talk 15:38, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

It looks like others have been here before complaining about your edits. Please do not make make major changes to articles and then mark your edits as minor as you did to the article Crucifixion in art. The edits were also clearly contentious Dmcq (talk) 18:34, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Re-edited and not marked as a minor edit _ImmortalYawn|Talk 18:38, 23 December 2009 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ministry of Defence, you will be blocked from editing. Stephen Burnett (talk) 19:34, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made toJew. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Intelligentsium 19:36, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Alcoholic beverage. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Stephen Burnett (talk) 19:37, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 19:45, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 17:26, 15 March 2011 (UTC)