User talk:Goatan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reasons:

Wikipedia:Autoblock of 195.92.40.49

Request handled by:  Netsnipe  ►  13:56, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Witness argument
Philosophy of psychology
Operation Black Buck
Argentine ground forces in the Falklands War
Sandhills Publishing Company
DNA Bioscience
Sun printing
David-Augustin de Brueys
Tumbledown
Silvia Moos
Social philosophy
Analytic philosophy
Diagoras
British ground forces in the Falklands War
Strong agnosticism
Spamglish
Operation Paraquat
HMS Yarmouth (F101)
Scott-David Allen
Cleanup
Kamau Kambon
Training and development
Silat
Merge
Regress argument
Freethought
Dualism
Add Sources
Weak atheism
Polytheism
Psychology of learning
Wikify
Robert Lowe, 1st Viscount Sherbrooke
Russell H. Dilday
IIITM Gwalior
Expand
Argentine Air Force
Learning Resources
Demographic history of the United States

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 21:50, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

atheism wikiproject[edit]

HI Goatan, I nabbed this nifty info box from the Digimon wikiproject, we could turn it into a good tool. Right now it has digimon stuff on it, but that can give us ideas, and help us out. Heres the template: [[1]]. If you could tell as many people as possible, that would be great. Perhaps we could replace the existing one at some point. Somerset219 08:02, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PYGMIES + DWARFS[edit]

I'd really just like to see some examples of the PYGMIES + DWARFS arguments in practice. PLEASE. --ZayZayEM 12:41, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Try

[2] or [www.pandasthumb.org/] or [www.talkorigins.org]

It is definitely most popular on Pharyngula but appears in message boards on all three I have also seen it on others that are less well frequented by me.

Here are a few to start you of from pandas thumb

But how does this explain PYGMIES & DWARFS? ;) http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/04/latest_fossil_f.html#comment-96276

I haven’t read the full thing yet. I’m hoping it explains pygmies and dwarves. http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/03/finally_someone.html#comment-90893

Pandas thumb readers are certainly used to it. “That calls for another round of “how is it there are PYGMIES + DWARFS??” http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2005/07/super-mutant_ki.html#comment-39593 www.pandasthumb.org/ Goatan 13:40, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I regularly read Pharyngula. You may also notice I started the PZ Myers article. I have not seen it used in Pharyngula after the original post and its reposting (this article seems to have been inspired by the reposting, not the original) - usage in comments bickering does not make this notable. I entirely understand this phrases origins, and its potenntial usages. however it is unencycklopedic and not notable. It's appearance on three message boards you visit does not make it notable. It makes it WP:SKOOL, it's a childish non-argument that serves no real purpose.--ZayZayEM 01:40, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You ask for examples I give you examples you ignore those examples and claim there WP:SKOOL, do I have to take you to every example ever posted to satisfy you? But I doubt that it would, I have given you three quick examples done in a ten minute break, if those blogs and forum where not notable you would be right but as those are arguably the 3 most notable Pro science Blogs and forum there is and there use of the phrase is notable, this is why I think it should be preferably merged into the PZ article which is realy were it belongs as it is a notable part of the Pharyngula community. Finally all I can say is I am surprised you haven’t seen it used on PZ’s site I am not a regular visitor to it and I see it.