User talk:Elvisisalive95

Metal-Head[edit]

Hi, I have a question about your edits to Metal-Head. You reverted the redirect and took off the merge template, saying, "Discussion can’t be closed after just one conclusive vote."

The article had an AfD discussion last week, which you unfortunately didn't participate in. The discussion ended as Merge. I don't like it when articles get redirected either, but you have to go by the results of the AfD discussion. Is there a reason why you're going against the AfD consensus? Toughpigs (talk) 18:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I unfortunately did not see the discussion in question and I would’ve argued that there are sufficient sources which merit Metal-Head remaining its own article. In my experiences on Wikipedia, a discussion cannot be closed after one person conclusively votes & another gives an either or as their vote. I don’t believe the discussion had sufficient time and votes or consensus to have been closed when dealing with such a big removal of content. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 18:43, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reinstated the Merge in respecting your time and knowledge on the Encyclopedia Elvisisalive95 (talk) 18:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I agree that was probably closed too early; in my opinion, it should have been relisted for another week. If you want to, you can ask people to review the close at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Maybe they'll open it up again. Thanks for your response; I appreciate it. Toughpigs (talk) 19:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You’re welcome! That’s along the lines of what I was thinking. Thank you for the advice, I’ll see you around! Elvisisalive95 (talk) 23:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Kall (June 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Kall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 00:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elvisisalive95! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SL93 (talk) 00:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]