User talk:DEVER SFG
March 2024[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bongaigaon have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bongaigaon was changed by DEVER SFG (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.906154 on 2024-03-12T11:37:32+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:37, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Bongaigaon Refinery Township, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, this is the small mistake by my account we try to fetch the valid reason to delete any content from any article on Wikipedia.
- Thank you! DEVER SFG (talk) 16:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Bongaigaon, you may be blocked from editing. The article appears to have been created in 2005 by an editor who was later blocked; this article does not appear to have been created in violation of that editor's 2007 ban. Please explain how the article's creation in 2005 was in violation of a block or ban? 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Blocked or Banned user creation articles does not exist on Wikipedia DEVER SFG (talk) 06:51, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- @DEVER SFG please read WP:BLOCK: "This does not mean that edits must be reverted just because they were made by a banned editor". Please explain how the 2005 creation of the article was in violation of that user's block or ban? In what way does the 2005 creation of the article violate their later block or ban? 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bongaigaon. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Adding references?[edit]
Could you explain what you were hoping to accomplish with this string of edits? None of these sources address the concerns I identified. signed, Rosguill talk 14:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
signed, Rosguill talk 14:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
March 2024[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.