User:Rodejong/Archive/2010

Don Adams (Actor)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Don Adams (Actor), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Don Adams. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:07, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Don Adams (Actor)

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Don Adams (Actor). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Don Adams. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Don Adams - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. --moreno oso (talk) 19:08, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Don Adams, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Don Adams was changed by Rodejong (u) (t) deleting 14404 characters on 2010-07-24T19:08:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:08, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Don Adams (Actor). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. elektrikSHOOS 19:23, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Don Adams. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --moreno oso (talk) 19:25, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Don Adams (Actor), you may be blocked from editing. elektrikSHOOS 19:26, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

If you want to move a page, read WP:MOVE. Copying and pasting content onto a new page is generally frowned upon as that doesn't preserve the page history. In any case, please make sure that there is consensus before you move any pages to a new title unless you deem the change to be uncontroversial, which isn't the case here. Please stop and seek consensus on the talk page before continuing. elektrikSHOOS 19:29, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page HEAT1X-TYCHO BRAHE do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Astronaut (talk) 08:30, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for that, Wasn't aware of any problems. Won't do it again. --Rodejong (talk) 22:32, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

December 2010

John E. Barr nominated for deletion

Proposed deletion of John E. Barr (Jehovah's Witnesses)

The article John E. Barr (Jehovah's Witnesses) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlackCab (talk) 23:52, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of John E. Barr (Jehovah's Witnesses) for deletion

The article John E. Barr (Jehovah's Witnesses) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John E. Barr (Jehovah's Witnesses) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jeffro77 (talk) 13:13, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

For technical reasons, this nomination has been withdrawn. See below.--Jeffro77 (talk) 13:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of John E. Barr (Jehovah's Witnesses) for deletion

The article John E. Barr (Jehovah's Witnesses) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John E. Barr (Jehovah's Witnesses) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jeffro77 (talk) 13:22, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

• • • The Nominations for John E. Barr are moved to my archive. --Rodejong (talk) 14:53, 22 December 2010 (UTC)