This page contains syntax errors ("cite%20note") caused by a VisualEditor bug. Do not copy/move content from this page until the errors have been repaired. See {{Warning VisualEditor bug}} for more information.
This is a user sandbox of Rajivk937. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section.
Evaluate article content by answering the following questions:
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? From reading the article in the Prevalence section there is only examples of studies reflecting academic procrastination. I feel an example of procrastination in industry would increase the prevalence factor of the topic. Perhaps this article as a reference: The Impact of Organizational and Personal Factors on Procrastination in Employees of a Modern Russian Industrial Enterprise.(http://lpclibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=132173924&site=ehost-live)
What else could be improved? In the intro it is stated:"Although typically perceived as a negative trait due to its hindering effect on one's productivity often associated with depression, low self-esteem, guilt and inadequacy;[3] it can also be considered a wise response to certain demands that could present risky or negative outcomes or require waiting for new information to arrive.[4]" I failed to see any expansion on the notion of procrastination being positive.
Evaluate the article's tone by answering the following questions:
Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Academic procrastination seems to be talked about a lot. I would like to see a section on procrastination in the work place, self-care just to name a couple.
Evaluating the article's sources by answering the following questions:
Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Yes
Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? From analyzing the talk page I found there was an one-sided sentence and upon reading the article it looks to be removed.
Lastly, Take a look at how others are talking about this article on the talk page and answer the following questions:
What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
