User:Hkim243/sandbox
 | This is a user sandbox of Hkim243. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
| This is a user sandbox of Hkim243. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
Eating Disorder Examination (EDE)
| Part of a series on |
| Psychology |
|---|
 |
Overview[edit]
Development and history[edit]
Versions[edit]
Reliability and validity[edit]
Reliability[edit]
| Criterion | Rating (adequate, good, excellent, too good[b]) | Explanation with references |
|---|---|---|
| Norms | Adequate | |
| Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha, split half, etc.) | Excellent | Alphas were > .90 for the School and Home versions.[2] |
| Inter-rater reliability | Less than adequate | reliability between parents and teachers was =.41[2] |
| Test-retest reliability (stability) | Adequate | Total score =.85 over a 4-week period[2] |
| Repeatability | Not published | No published studies formally checking repeatability |
Validity[edit]
| Criterion | Rating (adequate, good, excellent, too good[b]) | Explanation with references |
|---|---|---|
| Content validity | Adequate | Covers DSM diagnostic symptoms for both hyperactivity and impulsivity subtypes and combined type. |
| Construct validity (e.g., predictive, concurrent, convergent, and discriminant validity) | Excellent | In the clinical setting the predictive validity for the combined subscale for parents and teachers were 60% and 65% accuracy, respectively. This indicates that the assessment has statistically significant accuracy at identifying the diagnosis.[3] |
| Discriminative validity | Adequate | Statistically significant discrimination in mean rating between three groups of participants that identified as ADHD Combined, ADHD Inattentive and no ADHD.[3] |
| Validity generalization | Good | Used as other-report from both teachers and parents; used in school settings as well as clinical setting; assessment was normed on a random sample of the population that included many different ethnic and demographic backgrounds. |
| Treatment sensitivity | Adequate | Can be used in order to access progression of ADHD symptoms throughout treatment. |
| Clinical utility | Good | Easily accessible through the purchase of the handbook that includes the assessment and scoring information with permission to photocopy, strong psychometrics. Completion and scoring are quick and easy. |
- ^ a b Table from Youngstrom et al.,[full citation needed] extending Hunsley & Mash, 2008.[1][pages needed]
- ^ a b New construct or category.
Impact[edit]
Use in other populations[edit]
Limitations[edit]
See also[edit]
References[edit]
- ^ Hunsley, John; Mash, Eric (2008). A Guide to Assessments that Work. New York, NY: Oxford Press. ISBN 978-0195310641.
- ^ a b c Cite error: The named reference
:4was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ a b Cite error: The named reference
:5was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
Category:Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Category:Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Category:Clinical medicine Category:Questionnaire construction Category:Psychiatric diagnosis Category:Assessment and evaluation instruments